Comments on: Artist Rights Overlooked Again http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/2007/11/artist_rights_overlooked_again/ Copyright Information Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:47:42 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: createmo http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/2007/11/artist_rights_overlooked_again/#comment-3532 createmo Sun, 02 Nov 2008 08:54:40 +0000 #comment-3532 Thank you for your site :-) I made on photoshop backgrounds for youtube, myspace and even more my backgrounds:http://tinyurl.com/5assk2 Hope you had a good day and thank you again! Thank you for your site :-)
I made on photoshop backgrounds for youtube, myspace and even more
my backgrounds:http://tinyurl.com/5assk2
Hope you had a good day and thank you again!

]]> By: Anonymous http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/2007/11/artist_rights_overlooked_again/#comment-7 Anonymous Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-7 <p>I hope you're not singing "<a href="http://www.snopes.com/music/songs/birthday.asp">Happy Birthday</a>" because you should pay royalties. </p> I hope you're not singing "Happy Birthday" because you should pay royalties.

]]> By: Anonymous http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/2007/11/artist_rights_overlooked_again/#comment-14 Anonymous Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-14 <span style="font-size: 7.5pt; font-family: Verdana">I just vested both their sites...and find it very interesting that they are so fond of their work that they in fact use the copyright laws to protect their own intellectual properties. <p> </p></span><span style="font-size: 7.5pt; font-family: Verdana">What they don't realize is that they will be hard pressed to enforce their copyright under a defense of misuse....or it least that should be the case. <p> </p></span><p> </p> I just vested both their sites…and find it very interesting that they are so fond of their work that they in fact use the copyright laws to protect their own intellectual properties.

 

What they don't realize is that they will be hard pressed to enforce their copyright under a defense of misuse….or it least that should be the case.

 

 

]]>