<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s Never Been More Clear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/2008/07/its-never-been-more-clear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/2008/07/its-never-been-more-clear/</link>
	<description>Copyright Information</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Ross</title>
		<link>http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/2008/07/its-never-been-more-clear/#comment-458</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/?p=263#comment-458</guid>
		<description>It's clear many fail to understand the creative process, and the fact that an artist creates a new expression that no one else could create. This is not disrespecting other professions, it is a statement of fact that we enjoy creative works that would not otherwise exist without that person or persons exercising their own unique creativity. This should not be hard to grasp, but unfortunately among many who view creative works as interchangeable commodities or services, like pants cleaning or toilet repair, it most unfortunately is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s clear many fail to understand the creative process, and the fact that an artist creates a new expression that no one else could create. This is not disrespecting other professions, it is a statement of fact that we enjoy creative works that would not otherwise exist without that person or persons exercising their own unique creativity. This should not be hard to grasp, but unfortunately among many who view creative works as interchangeable commodities or services, like pants cleaning or toilet repair, it most unfortunately is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeT</title>
		<link>http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/2008/07/its-never-been-more-clear/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/?p=263#comment-404</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
I don’t have arguments? Perhaps instead of your attack you could actually address my complaint. Please explain how there is a commonality between dry-cleaning pants — a one-time act that can be done with minimal training — and combining the talent and years of training to play bass with Lou Reed and David Bowie.

I suspect both of us could quickly learn to dry-clean clothes. I suspect neither of us could ever achieve the musical skill level to perform with top-flight musicians, and I say that after having spent years playing the guitar and performing in public.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I fail to see why we should have a barely veiled caste system for labor, with highly skilled artisans being in essence the legal Brahmin class. I can think of several good classical liberal reasons why it is repugnant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
I don’t have arguments? Perhaps instead of your attack you could actually address my complaint. Please explain how there is a commonality between dry-cleaning pants — a one-time act that can be done with minimal training — and combining the talent and years of training to play bass with Lou Reed and David Bowie.</p>
<p>I suspect both of us could quickly learn to dry-clean clothes. I suspect neither of us could ever achieve the musical skill level to perform with top-flight musicians, and I say that after having spent years playing the guitar and performing in public.
</p></blockquote>
<p>I fail to see why we should have a barely veiled caste system for labor, with highly skilled artisans being in essence the legal Brahmin class. I can think of several good classical liberal reasons why it is repugnant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Sanchez</title>
		<link>http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/2008/07/its-never-been-more-clear/#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Sanchez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 05:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/?p=263#comment-357</guid>
		<description>"If it really was unclear" -- I think at this point interpretive charity is fairly clearly wasted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If it really was unclear&#8221; &#8212; I think at this point interpretive charity is fairly clearly wasted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/2008/07/its-never-been-more-clear/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/?p=263#comment-354</guid>
		<description>1. If it really was unclear, Tim didn't say an artist should be treated exactly like the dry cleaner. His example was meant as a reminder that getting paid 50 years after doing work is not the norm, but rather the exception, so rather than assume that it's a "natural right" we should carefully consider the details of the exception made. The question is what term makes sense - 14 years, 50 or 95.

2. If it's the dry cleaner that bothers you, there are better examples: a surgeon might take decades of work to achieve his ability, but he's only paid for actually doing surgery, not afterwards; an expert engineer likewise might be hired to design a system but he's only paid for doing the project, not for the many systems used and sold in the following years; etc. Now try your argument again with these.

Copyright is an exception created for artists because they are different from other professionals; but the difference is certainly not that it's harder or takes longer to learn to play an instrument than practice any other profession. To make a compelling argument you need to point out the real differences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. If it really was unclear, Tim didn&#8217;t say an artist should be treated exactly like the dry cleaner. His example was meant as a reminder that getting paid 50 years after doing work is not the norm, but rather the exception, so rather than assume that it&#8217;s a &#8220;natural right&#8221; we should carefully consider the details of the exception made. The question is what term makes sense - 14 years, 50 or 95.</p>
<p>2. If it&#8217;s the dry cleaner that bothers you, there are better examples: a surgeon might take decades of work to achieve his ability, but he&#8217;s only paid for actually doing surgery, not afterwards; an expert engineer likewise might be hired to design a system but he&#8217;s only paid for doing the project, not for the many systems used and sold in the following years; etc. Now try your argument again with these.</p>
<p>Copyright is an exception created for artists because they are different from other professionals; but the difference is certainly not that it&#8217;s harder or takes longer to learn to play an instrument than practice any other profession. To make a compelling argument you need to point out the real differences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Ross</title>
		<link>http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/2008/07/its-never-been-more-clear/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/?p=263#comment-349</guid>
		<description>It is also hard to see how you could dispute the "copyright opponent" label when you say a musician shouldn't be paid beyond their initial work. If a bass player lays down some tracks for an album in a studio, your argument would be that he should be paid for that work and nothing else. Then, any albums or singles sold after that would not net him a cent. That would mean that, at least for the artist, copyright did not exist. Perhaps you instead wish that all copyrights would be held by record labels with no obligation of payment to artists for album or singles sales, although that seems inconsistent with your, shall we say, hostility to the recording industry in past writings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is also hard to see how you could dispute the &#8220;copyright opponent&#8221; label when you say a musician shouldn&#8217;t be paid beyond their initial work. If a bass player lays down some tracks for an album in a studio, your argument would be that he should be paid for that work and nothing else. Then, any albums or singles sold after that would not net him a cent. That would mean that, at least for the artist, copyright did not exist. Perhaps you instead wish that all copyrights would be held by record labels with no obligation of payment to artists for album or singles sales, although that seems inconsistent with your, shall we say, hostility to the recording industry in past writings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Ross</title>
		<link>http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/2008/07/its-never-been-more-clear/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/?p=263#comment-347</guid>
		<description>Speaking of disputing labels, I should point out that while some of my members are registered lobbyists -- including folks from the corporations, trade associations, unions and artists' groups that belong to the Copyright Alliance -- I in fact am not a lobbyist. I hold nothing against those who are, they are exercising their constitutional right to petition the government, and at some point I may register as one. But I do not currently qualify for registration even under even the heightened rules recently applied. My advocacy for copyright is no different than that of your advocacy against the "poor musician" who wants to get paid beyond his initial recording session.

I don't have arguments? Perhaps instead of your attack you could actually address my complaint. Please explain how there is a commonality between dry-cleaning pants -- a one-time act that can be done with minimal training -- and combining the talent and years of training to play bass with Lou Reed and David Bowie. 

I suspect both of us could quickly learn to dry-clean clothes. I suspect neither of us could ever achieve the musical skill level to perform with top-flight musicians, and I say that after having spent years playing the guitar and performing in public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of disputing labels, I should point out that while some of my members are registered lobbyists &#8212; including folks from the corporations, trade associations, unions and artists&#8217; groups that belong to the Copyright Alliance &#8212; I in fact am not a lobbyist. I hold nothing against those who are, they are exercising their constitutional right to petition the government, and at some point I may register as one. But I do not currently qualify for registration even under even the heightened rules recently applied. My advocacy for copyright is no different than that of your advocacy against the &#8220;poor musician&#8221; who wants to get paid beyond his initial recording session.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have arguments? Perhaps instead of your attack you could actually address my complaint. Please explain how there is a commonality between dry-cleaning pants &#8212; a one-time act that can be done with minimal training &#8212; and combining the talent and years of training to play bass with Lou Reed and David Bowie. </p>
<p>I suspect both of us could quickly learn to dry-clean clothes. I suspect neither of us could ever achieve the musical skill level to perform with top-flight musicians, and I say that after having spent years playing the guitar and performing in public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technology Liberation Front &#187; Archive &#187; It&#8217;s Never Been More Clear</title>
		<link>http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/2008/07/its-never-been-more-clear/#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>Technology Liberation Front &#187; Archive &#187; It&#8217;s Never Been More Clear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/?p=263#comment-344</guid>
		<description>[...] to know why copyright lobbyists never seem to have any real arguments? Because they describe those of us who defend the traditional contours of copyright law&#8212;including &#8220;limited [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to know why copyright lobbyists never seem to have any real arguments? Because they describe those of us who defend the traditional contours of copyright law&mdash;including &#8220;limited [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
