<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rights, Education and Morality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/2008/11/rights-education-and-morality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/2008/11/rights-education-and-morality/</link>
	<description>Copyright Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:02:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Allen</title>
		<link>http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/2008/11/rights-education-and-morality/#comment-6493</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/?p=341#comment-6493</guid>
		<description>you said: &quot;The point I’m getting at is that I’m reluctant to apply motives regarding morality to those who I feel disrespect the rights of creators by devaluing the worth of their product simply because it is digitized. I can disagree with them vehemently but it is not my place to pass judgment on them....&quot;
Patrick, given the tone of the preceding comments it&#039;s evident that they have no hesitation passing judgment on you. I&#039;ll stand with Mr. Johnson and any other principled creator against this technologically enabled barbarism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you said: &#8220;The point I’m getting at is that I’m reluctant to apply motives regarding morality to those who I feel disrespect the rights of creators by devaluing the worth of their product simply because it is digitized. I can disagree with them vehemently but it is not my place to pass judgment on them&#8230;.&#8221;<br />
Patrick, given the tone of the preceding comments it&#8217;s evident that they have no hesitation passing judgment on you. I&#8217;ll stand with Mr. Johnson and any other principled creator against this technologically enabled barbarism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neal</title>
		<link>http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/2008/11/rights-education-and-morality/#comment-4441</link>
		<dc:creator>Neal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 22:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/?p=341#comment-4441</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no difference between my constructive comment and yours. 

You seem quite happy to generalise and stereotype groups of individuals, so why shouldn&#039;t I?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no difference between my constructive comment and yours. </p>
<p>You seem quite happy to generalise and stereotype groups of individuals, so why shouldn&#8217;t I?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Ross</title>
		<link>http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/2008/11/rights-education-and-morality/#comment-4350</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 22:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/?p=341#comment-4350</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Neal, for that constructive comment.

John, I honestly don&#039;t know if I have. Have you ever referred to one of my blog posts as &quot;articulate and thought-provoking&quot;? You have the right to think none of them are, but I suppose then I&#039;d have the same right regarding other works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Neal, for that constructive comment.</p>
<p>John, I honestly don&#8217;t know if I have. Have you ever referred to one of my blog posts as &#8220;articulate and thought-provoking&#8221;? You have the right to think none of them are, but I suppose then I&#8217;d have the same right regarding other works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Gordon</title>
		<link>http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/2008/11/rights-education-and-morality/#comment-4345</link>
		<dc:creator>John Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/?p=341#comment-4345</guid>
		<description>Patrick, have you even once described an article you disagreed with as &quot;articulate and thought-provoking&quot; or similar? I&#039;ve searched your site and I can&#039;t find any such. I am forced to conclude that &quot;articulate&quot; to you means something that echoes your party line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick, have you even once described an article you disagreed with as &#8220;articulate and thought-provoking&#8221; or similar? I&#8217;ve searched your site and I can&#8217;t find any such. I am forced to conclude that &#8220;articulate&#8221; to you means something that echoes your party line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neal</title>
		<link>http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/2008/11/rights-education-and-morality/#comment-4265</link>
		<dc:creator>Neal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/?p=341#comment-4265</guid>
		<description>So what you are making is the broad generalisation that people who &quot;steal&quot; (in your view) copyright, have no morals. 

That&#039;s pretty rich coming from a group of corporate thugs and bullies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what you are making is the broad generalisation that people who &#8220;steal&#8221; (in your view) copyright, have no morals. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s pretty rich coming from a group of corporate thugs and bullies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

