Kudos to USTR Ron Kirk (my second praise for him today) and his team for last week’s update on the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) negotiations. I was traveling then but I’ve had a chance to read the summary they issued on the negotiations, and I think all of us in the creative community should feel good about how things are going.

We should also recognize that there was no statutory or other obligation for USTR to share this information. As they did last fall with an open meeting, they are demonstrating their commitment to transparency. As they note in the summary in response to calls to have everything done in the open, however:

A variety of groups have shown their interest in getting more information on the substance of the negotiations and have requested that the draft text be disclosed. However, it is accepted practice during trade negotiations among sovereign states to not share negotiating texts with the public at large, particularly at earlier stages of the negotiation. This allows delegations to exchange views in confidence facilitating the negotiation and compromise that are necessary in order to reach agreement on complex issues. At this point in time, ACTA delegations are still discussing various proposals for the different elements that may ultimately be included in the agreement. A comprehensive set of proposals for the text of the agreement does not yet exist.

After that meeting last fall I ran into a foreign official I know from one of the ACTA negotiationg countries, who was very concerned the U.S. would cave in and broadcast the substance of ACTA meetings. That official’s country and others, the official said, could not continue with negotiations if they couldn’t put engage in give-and-take necessary in these situations, which often involve positions not yet approved for public announcement by the respective governments.

Has no one studied U.S. history? Does no one remember that our Founding Fathers locked themselves in a room with closed windows in Philadelphia all summer — no fresh air! wigs and wool coats! — because they felt they could sell the populace on a federal government once a constitution was written, but if each debatable point was to be hashed out in public they knew the Articles of Confederation would stand, and the confederation itself would fall. Hey Madison, what about transparency?

Let’s be honest here — those calling for “transparency” don’t want more international IP enforcement, they found a media-friendly way to try to kill the talks.

But the talks aren’t dead, and if the summary is any guide of what will emerge, these groups have little to fear. The key point, which USTR has hit on before, is in Chapter Two, Section 2, Border Measures. Can we stop already with this canard about seizing iPods at the border? As if border agents don’t have enough to worry about. The summary talks about a de minimis exception for travelers crossing borders with goods for personal use. First of all, there would have been no way of knowing if tracks on an iPod were infringed or not, but now it doesn’t matter. It also appears I could go to Tijuana, buy up a duffle bag’s worth of pirated DVDs, drive into California, and claim the personal use exemption, even though they were clearly illegal. I am obviously not condoning that, but my point is that Section 2 is clearly aimed at bigger fish.

The rest of the summary reflects exactly what USTR has been saying about ACTA from Day One — namely, that this is a voluntary effort among developed and emerging economies to better coordinate international enforcement and to clarify ambiguities surrounding enforcement.

Ultimately, we are talking about countries that have voluntarily signed treaties obligating them to enforce creators’ rights taking steps to better meet that obligation. Works for me. I look forward to a final treaty, and I hope many nations sign up.

Share this:

This entry was posted on Thursday, April 16th, 2009 at 2:21 pm by Patrick Ross and is filed under copyright opponents, founding fathers, international, piracy. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.