<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congress Addresses P2P Privacy Threats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/2009/05/congress-addresses-p2p-privacy-threats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/2009/05/congress-addresses-p2p-privacy-threats/</link>
	<description>Copyright Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:02:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Copyright Alliance Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; FTC Warns of P2P-Caused Data Breaches</title>
		<link>http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/2009/05/congress-addresses-p2p-privacy-threats/#comment-52590</link>
		<dc:creator>The Copyright Alliance Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; FTC Warns of P2P-Caused Data Breaches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 23:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/?p=426#comment-52590</guid>
		<description>[...] Bono Mack (R-CA) are seeking to protect consumers with HR-1319, the Informed P2P User Act, which we&#8217;ve noted calls on the FTC to regulate P2P providers to ensure they aggressively inform consumers of risks [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bono Mack (R-CA) are seeking to protect consumers with HR-1319, the Informed P2P User Act, which we&#8217;ve noted calls on the FTC to regulate P2P providers to ensure they aggressively inform consumers of risks [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neal</title>
		<link>http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/2009/05/congress-addresses-p2p-privacy-threats/#comment-19108</link>
		<dc:creator>Neal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 02:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.copyrightalliance.org/?p=426#comment-19108</guid>
		<description>&quot;As I always say when speaking, a technology that like any technology is not good or evil, it just is&quot;

Except you have repeatedly and consistently painted *anyone* who uses Bit Torrent for *any* purposes as a pirate, with no room for debate or defense. (Another lie!)

If technology isn&#039;t inherently evil, then there&#039;s no need for Deep Packet Inspection and monitoring by ISPs - because that&#039;s far more evil than any form of Bit Torrent use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As I always say when speaking, a technology that like any technology is not good or evil, it just is&#8221;</p>
<p>Except you have repeatedly and consistently painted *anyone* who uses Bit Torrent for *any* purposes as a pirate, with no room for debate or defense. (Another lie!)</p>
<p>If technology isn&#8217;t inherently evil, then there&#8217;s no need for Deep Packet Inspection and monitoring by ISPs &#8211; because that&#8217;s far more evil than any form of Bit Torrent use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

